Deep-Sea name details

Euctenidiacea

382232  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:382232)

J. Tardy, 1970
 unaccepted
Suborder
marine, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Not documented
Nomenclature Euctenidiacea includes the dorid-like nudibranchs and is named Nudibranchia (Anthobranchia) in Schrödl, Wägele & Willan...  
Nomenclature Euctenidiacea includes the dorid-like nudibranchs and is named Nudibranchia (Anthobranchia) in Schrödl, Wägele & Willan (2001) and in Grande et al. (2004). Bouchet & Rocroi (2005) rejected the name Anthobranchia on the grounds that it included also Onchidium at the time of original publication. Opinions welcome on which name to be used.  [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2025). MolluscaBase. Euctenidiacea. Accessed through: Glover, A.G.; Higgs, N.; Horton, T. (2025) World Register of Deep-Sea species (WoRDSS) at: https://www.marinespecies.org/deepsea/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=382232 on 2025-05-13
Glover, A.G.; Higgs, N.; Horton, T. (2025). World Register of Deep-Sea species (WoRDSS). Euctenidiacea. Accessed at: https://marinespecies.org/deepsea/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=382232 on 2025-05-13
Date
action
by
2009-02-03 09:16:23Z
created
2010-12-16 18:14:56Z
changed
2017-12-24 03:33:33Z
changed
2018-10-11 01:31:59Z
changed

basis of record Bouchet, P. & Rocroi, J.-P. (2005). Classification and nomenclator of gastropod families. <em>Malacologia.</em> 47 (1-2): 1-397. [20 July]., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/25127200 [details] Available for editors  PDF available

additional source An outline for the classification of Phylum Mollusca in taxonomic databases [report elaborated by WoRMS editors for internal use, june 2010] [details] OpenAccess publication
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature Euctenidiacea includes the dorid-like nudibranchs and is named Nudibranchia (Anthobranchia) in Schrödl, Wägele & Willan (2001) and in Grande et al. (2004). Bouchet & Rocroi (2005) rejected the name Anthobranchia on the grounds that it included also Onchidium at the time of original publication. Opinions welcome on which name to be used.  [details]